The McTutor World is on the rise. Private tutoring is growing by leaps and bounds and it’s now the fastest growing segment of Canadian K-12 education. Since the financial meltdown of 2008, the tutoring business has rebounded, particularly in major Canadian cities and the burgeoning suburbs. From 2010 to 2013, Kumon Math centre enrollment in Canada rose by 23% and is now averaging 5 % growth a year. It’s estimated that one in three city parents in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Calgary now hire private tutors for their kids.
My recent radio interviews on CBC Radio Drive Home shows (September 4-5, 2014) focused on the trend and tackled the bigger question of why today’s parents are turning increasingly to after-school tutors to supplement the regular school program. That’s a question that begs for a more thorough, in-depth explanation.
The expansion of private tutoring is driven by a combination of factors. The world is changing and, for good or ill, we now inhabit an increasingly competitive global world. International student testing is one symptom and so are provincial testing programs — and parents are better informed than ever before on where students and schools rank in terms of student achievement. While high school graduation rates are rising, student performance indicators are either flat-lined or declining, especially in Atlantic Canada. In most Canadian provinces, university educated parents also have higher expectations for their children and the entire public education system is geared more to university preparation than to employability skills.
System issues play a critical role in convincing parents to turn to tutors. Promoting “Success for All” has come to signify a decline in standards and the entrenchment of “social promotion” reflected in student reports overflowing with edu-babble about “learning outcomes” but saying little about the pupils themselves. When parents see their kids struggling to read and unable to perform simple calculations, reassurances that “everything is fine” raises more red flags.
New elementary school curricula in Literacy and Mathematics only compound the problem —and both “Discovery Math” and “Whole Language” reading approaches now face a groundswell of parental dissent, especially in Manitoba, Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario. It’s no accident that the private tutors provide early reading instruction utilizing systematic phonics and most teach Math using traditional numbers based methods.
The tutoring business is definitely market-driven and more sensitive to public demand and expectations. Canadian academic researchers Scott Davies and Janice Aurini have shown the dramatic shift, starting in the mid-1990s, toward the franchising of private tutoring. Up until then, tutoring was mostly a “cottage industry” run in homes and local libraries, mainly serving high schoolers, and focusing on homework completion and test/exam preparation. With the entry of franchises like Sylvan Learning, Oxford Learning, and Kumon, tutoring evolved into private “learning centres” in cities and the affluent suburbs. The new tutoring centres, typically compact 1,200 sq. ft spaces in shopping plazas, offered initial learning level assessments, study skills programs, Math skills instruction, career planning, and even high school and university admissions testing preparation.
Hiring private tutors can be costly, but parents today are determined to come to the rescue of their struggling kids or to give the motivated child an extra edge. Today it’s gone far beyond introducing your child to reading with “Fun with Phonics” and some Walmart stores even stock John Mighton’s tutoring books for the JUMP Math program. An initial assessment costs $99 to $125 and can be irresistable after reading those jargon-filled, mark-less reports. For a full tutoring program, two nights a week, the costs can easily reach $2,o00 to $3,000 a school year. Once enrolled, parents are far more likely to look to private independent schools, a more expensive option, but one that can make after-school family life a lot simpler and less hectic.
The tutoring explosion is putting real pressure on today’s public schools. Operating from 8:30 am until 3:00 pm, with “bankers’ hours,” regular schools are doing their best to cope with the new demands and competition, in the form of virtual learning and after-hours tutoring programs. Parents are expecting more and, like Netflicks, on demand! That is likely to be at the centre of a much larger public conversation about the future of traditional, bricks and mortar, limited hours schooling.
What explains the phenomenal growth of private tutoring? With public schools closing at 3:00 pm, will today’s parents turn increasingly to online, virtual education to plug the holes and address the skills deficit? How will we insure that access to private tutors does not further deepen the educational inequities already present in Canada and the United States? Will the “Shadow Education” system expand to the point that public schools are forced to respond to the competition?
Some private tutoring is more affordable. For those less wealthy parents, group tutoring ($10/session) are probably also on the rise. A single-parent colleague of mine uses it frequently in Peel District (west of Toronto) for her 4 children. I also see Spirit of Math, an enrichment math program, expanding at an astronomical rate. I put my daughter in because she had no confidence in math despite quite a natural ability, and I had no confidence in the text or method being used in the classroom.
All my Chinese friends, despite Ontario’s reporting of their greater confidence in the education system than for Canadians of European descent, use tutoring – cheap group tutoring in Chinatown, and the more expensive options Spirit of Math, Kumon and private lessons – from one source only to a blend.
And a teacher friend of mine whose daughter’s home school usually ranks among Ontario’s best told me 5 year ago that one of the main reasons was because at least 80% of the kids in that school get private tutoring.
One of the giant reasons is non English immigration of affluent immigrants. I live close to a few tutor schools and a massive Chinese community and others who want their kids to catch up faster than the longer slower public school
Many of the kids I see were born here, so I’m not sure they would be catching up. The parents are just not sure they can help their kids with their English language homework (even math, because it is so language-based these days). Also, many if not most of the parents of those using the $10/h group services in Chinatown are not really “affluent” – not low income, mind you, but definitely not affluent. More in the range of families of 4 with incomes from about $50-80K.
There are some fairly poor Chinese immigrant areas where I live (central Toronto) – the kids go to subsidized camps in the summer and live-in grandparents provide child care during the school year. They are very frugal and any extra money they have goes toward supporting their children’s education. Average household income in my area is about $43K.
You just have to see the so-called IB, Sci/Tech, AP reading and writing skills I see everyday to understand why the PeelDSB is known as the Mordor of Education They simply aren’t doing a very good job. Many teachers belong to their school’s 3pm track team and don’t offer after school help where its needed the most.Most of these kids can’t take a simple literary passage and write a coherent precis.They try to squeeze every last detail into their piece b/c they can’t distinguish between a main idea and a supported fact. Moreover if you ask them to write a simple thesis statement they look at you with a blank stare. We are helping as many as we can by using both AI and phonics
Writing skills do matter and here’s the latest evidence:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/05/grammar-infographic_n_5767902.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000020&ir=Education
My own recent Survey of Private Tutoring Centres in Canada turned up some revealing information. Here are the Number of Franchised Tutoring outlets, by Canadian province and city:
Total Numbers, Canada: Kumon Math (325+), Oxford Learning (140), including 90 in Ontario.
Metropolitan Toronto and GTA: Kumon Math (18+), Sylvan Learning (15+), Oxford Learning (Numerous);
Calgary: Kumon Math (8), Oxford Learning (2), Sylvan Learning (2);
Edmonton: Kumon Math (4), Oxford Learning (4), Sylvan Learning (4);
Ottawa: Kumon Math (6), Sylvan Learning (2), Oxford Learning (4);
Halifax: Sylvan Learning (3), Oxford Learning (3), Kumon Math (1);
Saskatchewan: Kumon Math (4), Sylvan Learning (4), Oxford Learning (2).
Windsor, ON: Kumon Math (4), Sylvan Learning (2), Oxford Learning (2+)
Kumon Math now has outlets in St. John’s, NL, and Whitehorse, YK.
Enrolment growth for Kumon Math is greatest in the GTA, but from 2009-2011, Kumon numbers grew fastest in Quebec (53%), Ontario (45%), Manitoba (45%), and Alberta (21%). Some 170 of the 323 Kumon outlets in September 2013, offered Junior Kumon for ages 3-6 kids.
Tutoring has been supplementing education for decades and yes, growing by leaps and bounds. When I sat on the Ontario EQAO (testing agency) board, I urged them to collect data on tutoring through their parent survey. No way. I still urge them to collect this information as there is no honest way of knowing what kind of effect tutoring is actually having on a school.
I suspect the govt and school boards would rather 1. attribute success to what is happening in the classroom, even though it could be tutoring that makes the difference or 2. blame poor results on demographics (“it’s the poor kids, it’s the poor parents, it’s the poor neighborhood, etc.”) because they can’t afford the help needed for students that have been taught by practices that don’t work.
I know of one high school in my area that had its principal declare at a recent graduation, “Thank god for Kumon for our great math results!”
It would be useful to have accurate figures on tutoring, especially for math results.
The story of the principal who said “Thank god for Kumon for our great math results!” . . . tant pis (too bad). It may say as much about the system as it does about the high school since by grade nine it is hard to change things in a few months.
BTW
My dream teaching job for decades was to teach middle school math. It would have been fun and challenging and my students would have been in for a different experience. Alas, it was not to be.
The rise of tutoring could appear to be a reflection of the decline of public education, but it more accurately may reflect the drive of parents to have their children succeed in education. Look at South Korea, which many consider to have a successful education system. Children spend significant time after school in South Korea receiving extra support in order to improve their post-secondary opportunities.
Watched CNN last year where an expert pointed out that Korean parents spend as much money on tutoring as American parents spend on video games.
I think if parents can afford they should consider private tutoring in addition to the regular educational system aka schools. When I was a kid I had tutors for math/geometry, physics and language/literature. I was really good at math to begin with, but no way a teacher of 20-30 kids class can spend their time on helping every kid. Needless to say I got 95% at math, physics, bio. Had no problems at getting accepted into university. Now I have two little kids, and I’m debating whether to pay money for private school or regular school plus private tutors, I’ll go with the second option( unless we win a lottery and will be able to afford private school and tutors).
Regular teachers just can’t possibly help every kid in their class, and as kids go on to junior high and high schools, the educational material gets harder and harder. I finished high school 10 years ago, there’s no way in another 10 years when my oldest daughter is in high school I’ll be able to help her with math, I won’t remember a whole lot of it.
but I have a question: sprit of math is not teaching math. it’s mostly IQ question not math concepts. am I wrong?
The Spirit of Math is heavily dependent upon mastering mental computations, Maria. That does involve an element of memorization but it seems to build confidence in most students. If my daughter is any indication, it proved to be her salvation. She quickly learned her math operations and became a better student. It works extraordinarily well with students preparing for math contests where you have to be capable of moving to higher level, multi-part questions.
We see it as the next best alternative to private schools and also getting a customized, personal learning for our child.
At this day and age, we think it makes more sense to upgrade to more technological resources like online tutoring in real-time and have the flexibility, safety and many more benefits that comes with it.
We use http://www.skooli.com and highly recommend it to all parents out there.
You won’t be disappointed for sure!
[…] considering jumping into private tutoring, it is necessary and important that you build-up a good teaching portfolio, ensuring you have the […]